Monday, April 7, 2014

SC lawmakers claim university program designed to recruit lesbians

STAFF REPORTS | COLUMBIA -- Issues about LGBT people in the state's colleges and universities continues to dominate the attention and ire of South Carolina lawmakers. The latest controversy stems from a program that was to be presented in a LGBT symposium hosted by the University of South Carolina Upstate  that included a lecture titled, “How to be a lesbian in 10 days or less.”
That lecture drew the anger of State Senator Mike Fair(R) who alleges that university students are being "recruited" to be gay.
"It's just not normal and then you glorify, or it seems to me, that the promotion at USC is glorification of same sex orientation,” Fair told local media outlets adding “That's not an explanation of 'I was born this way.’  It's recruiting,” he said.
The assistant vice chancellor for USC Upstate communications, Tammy E. Whaley, sent local television station WYFF a statement that read:
“The title of ‘How to Become a Lesbian in 10 Days or Less,’ while deliberately provocative, is satirical in nature but has not been received as such. The controversy surrounding this performance has become a distraction to the educational mission of USC Upstate and the overall purpose of the Bodies of Knowledge symposium. As a result, we have canceled this segment of the symposium.”
Last month lawmakers voted to cut $70,000 collectively from the College of Charleston and the University of South Carolina Upstate. 
The House rejected multiple attempts to restore $52,000 cut from the College of Charleston in the state budget, and $17,142 cut from the University of South Carolina Upstate. Those are the amounts the universities spent on books assigned to their incoming freshmen last summer. The efforts failed by votes of 69-41, 70-43, 71-40 and 71-38.
College of Charleston students read “Fun Home,” a book by Alison Bechdel that describes her childhood with a closeted gay father and her own coming out as a lesbian. USC Upstate assigned “Out Loud: The Best of Rainbow Radio,” referring to South Carolina’s first gay and lesbian radio show, for a freshmen course that included lectures and other out-of-classroom activities meant to spark discussions about the book.
Representative Garry Smith(R), whose House subcommittee made the reductions, said he wanted to make a point after college officials declined to give students an option to read something else. He said he wouldn’t oppose the books if they were part of an elective course. He called it promotion of a lifestyle.
“Freedom comes with responsibility. These universities did not act responsibly,” said Smith, R-Simpsonville.
Gail Stephenson, president of the LGBT equality rights group Upstate Pride, said lawmakers are being unfair to both the university and its students.
“Diversity is diversity.  And we can't just say we are going to choose this part of diversity, but we're not going to choose this part of diversity.  Then what's next?  Are we going to cut out women's studies?  Racial integration?” said Gail Stephenson.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. 


Tim Trent said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tim Trent said...

I am reminded of my UK university in 1972, where the student magazine Redbrick published an article "Who's a Wanker" to popular acclaim. See for the text:

In summer 1972, just after the Gay Liberation Front yearly conference, a conference with different venues each year held that year in Birmingham, in the Guild of Students, Redbrick published a controversial article titled 'Who's a Wanker?', which described practical aspects of homosexuality, a highly controversial matter then. The issue ran out and had to be reprinted. Simultaneously, it was reported to the Press Council because of that article, and it was subsequently withdrawn.

The difference is that the title was not satirical, and the paper was published. These were, I suppose, the heady days following the legalisation in 1967 of sex between consenting adults (21 and over) in private in the UK.

It seems that, in 2014, 42 years after we were slightly more advanced in the UK, the USA is dipping its toe tentatively in the same water, but finding it too hot.

I would like to congratulate the "Land of the Free" for its courage in considering joining the 20th century, 14 years after that century ended.